Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Interview with A.S. King, Author of The Dust of 100 Dogs

First off, I wanted to thank everyone who posted questions and, of course I wanted to thank A.S. King for all of her help this month. You rock, Amy! Thank you for the amazing, thought provoking answers!

Without further adieu, please welcome A.S. King!

Tami Asked:

What is your writing schedule like and what is your favorite time to write?

A.S. King:

My schedule is insane at the moment. Nothing here is sane or regular or routine and it’s driving me a little bonkers. I have two small kids, so until they’re both in school, it’s a chaos-driven writing schedule. Mostly, I write in chunks of time. But, if I get to choose? My favorite time to write is ALL DAY. ☺

What are the top 3 things you have to have on your desk each time you sit down
to write?



A.S. King:

Really, all I need is my computer and me. I have a revision pencil (refillable) that I’ve had since 8th grade that I like to have around. A cup of coffee always helps.

Joanne Levy asked:

Hi A.S.!

I LOVED The Dust of 100 Dogs and especially that it made me think of SO MANY different things. I think a lot of the book is very open to interpretation, so I'm curious as to some of the feedback you may have gotten that you weren't expecting. Care to share any enlightening/weird/unexpected comments you've received about the book?

And here's a personal question: what is your favorite dog breed?


A.S. King:

Hey Joanne! Thanks for reading D100D. So happy you dug it!
Like any book, feedback has been varied and interesting. I suppose the most surprising thing so far for me is: the book covers some very serious human subjects like genocide, domestic violence, child abuse, sexual slavery and sexual assault, but far more readers voice concern about Rusty, the Doberman who is repeatedly maltreated by his owner. Don’t get me wrong. I love dogs—anyone who knows me knows how much I love dogs and abhor violence—and I’m really glad people are hating how Fred treats Rusty, because it’s wrong. I just find it interesting that people choose to comment so urgently about violence against dogs when in the same book, so many violent crimes are committed against humans.


This has really made me think. Are we so desensitized to violence against humans that we don’t see it? Or have we come to expect it? Imagine we saw, on the TV, 150,000 instances of dog violence before we turned 18, the way we see violence against humans. Would we be as desensitized to dog violence then? Would we stop seeing that, too? Deep thoughts, I know, but you asked!


My favorite dog breed -- Chocolate Labrador. Goofy, lovable and the way they smell in the rain is just so nice.

Robin Brande asked:

Okay, here's what I want to know: How much of you is in Emer, the girl pirate? Are you like her, or do you just wish you were like her?

Also, was it hard to write the scenes where Fred is being so abusive to Rusty? Because those were really hard to read! Poor Rusty!

Loved the book. Loved it so much I would marry it.


A.S. King:

Hi Robin! You rock for wanting to marry my book. (I am actually able to arrange that, if you’re interested.)


My life has been charmed compared to Emer’s. I do deal with adversity similarly. Head up—honor in battle. But I am a strict pacifist, so fighting is out of the question. Could I do it if faced with physical harm? Probably not. I’ve been robbed at gunpoint in real life and let me tell ya, I couldn’t do much more than shake in my boots and blink. I can’t say I wish I was like Emer either. I mean, she’s got some baggage—mostly power issues—that I’m quite happy to sidestep, thanks. ☺ If I could choose, I’d be Saffron, starting right where the book ends.


You bet it was hard to write those scenes about Fred being mean to Rusty. Really hard. But those were not the parts of the book that made me cry. The Cromwellian attack scene was super hard to write. The scene with Emer & the Frenchman in the cave was also super hard. But I agree thoroughly about how hard those Fred scenes are to read—Poor Rusty!

Terri Probst asked:

Amy, first I don't think I've told you how I loved the book. My 9yr old said "Wow, YOU know someone who's written a book??" I'm going to read it to the boys 5 + 9, with a bit of editing-hope you don't mind.

My question is how do I get you to central PA for a signing? We have D. Dashem in LH and Otto's in Williamsport. I have a very comfy futon...

A.S. King:

Thanks Terri! So glad you liked it.
You’ll need some serious editing for 5 & 9 year olds! I’d love to be a fly on that wall.


I am hoping to make it up to central PA this year sometime. I haven’t seen Lock Haven for at least fifteen years! Thanks to the info contained in your question, I’ve contacted Otto’s to see if they’d be interested. I’ll be in touch!

Heather M. Riley asked:

I'm still reading right now, but the first thing I noticed was the time frame. Aside from the flashback scenes where we see Emer's childhood. I also found it interesting that you chose to have her reborn as Saffron in the 70's and therefore the story doesn't take place in our current time but in the recent past. What made you decide on this time setting?

A.S. King:

Hi Heather!
First, when I started working on the book, as early as 1999, I had no concept of 2009 in my brain, same as we’re not thinking of 2019 right now. Second, I had a vision that Saffron’s dad was going to be a Vietnam War veteran, which made sense to set her birth in the early 1970s. Third, I was born in 1970, so I could relate to Saffron’s childhood better if I set her age close to my own. And fourth—probably the most important—usually my characters & plots & settings choose themselves. I have very little to do with it.

Tracy Belsher asked:

There are many historic details in this book - the settings, time periods, treatment of women, the reoccurring slavery theme – hell, you even work in Gettysburg. How did you approach researching for D100D – was it overwhelming?

A.S. King:

Hi Tracy!
For me, it was invigorating. I was scared of history class [memorization] in school, and so, I managed to graduate without much history knowledge, and avoid landing on the yellow squares in Trivial Pursuit for many years. But something hit me when I moved to Ireland. History presented itself to me—in the landscape, in town, it was everywhere. When we moved to Tipperary, I started to read a lot about it. My reading eventually led to an interest to write about it. The smaller historical mentions, like Gettysburg or Turner’s Rebels, came from a few small books I had sitting around about American history. So, really, D100D was the result of what I was reading and learning, rather than the other way around.


Deke Snow asked:

Was there one character, or even one trait of a character that you identified with most while writing the book? Is there some of you in any of your characters?


A.S. King:

Hey Deke!
I think there’s probably a little of me in all of the characters, even if, in characters like Fred, I write representations of everything I reject or fear. But not to be obtuse, I think I could certainly relate to Saffron while she was dying to get out of high school. Aren’t we all dying to leave school and search for treasure (life)?


Also, Emer and I share the experience of holding a deep love for someone we had to live without for a period of time. My husband and I were separated by the Atlantic Ocean for about five years, and 20 blissful years later, thinking about it still hurts.


Last but not least, I asked Amy to share a little something about what she's working on now.


A.S. King:

If you can talk about your new book, what is the plot in a few quick sentences?

Explaining the plot in a few sentences, I can’t do. But here’s something I came up with while I was trying. IGNORE VERA DIETZ (Random House/Knopf 2010) is about a teenage girl, her dead (ex) best friend, and her attempt to clear his name. It’s also about destiny. And a neighborhood full of secrets. And a sarcastic pagoda. And vocabulary words.


Thanks you SO MUCH for having me!

Comments (18)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Busted on the fact that some of us (me) are more concerned about Rusty than Emer! You're so right! That scene in the cave really is awful, and I felt terrible for her. I guess I felt Emer was better able to pick herself up and ultimately triumph over the Frenchman and others, whereas the dog just had to stay and take it.

And yes, please do make the necessary arrangements for me to marry your book. Let me break it to my husband first.
1 reply · active 833 weeks ago
Oh duh. I had no idea of this clever reply button. See below! But you were NOT BUSTED. I'm THRILLED when people comment about what's happening to Rusty. It just made me think, is all.
No no Robin! I TOTALLY understand why readers are so concerned about Rusty! TOTALLY. As I mentioned in a blog post last month, I discussed this at length with a reader & I get why this reaction happened. But the question asked to me was: was there anything that surprised me or made me think--and I have to say, it really did. I'm still thinking about it. (Even today, another blogger reviewed it and this was their #1 problem with the book!) We are a great culture who champions for helpless animals, and I think that's awesome. But. We are also some seriously desensitized culture when it comes to violence--especially violence against women.
5 replies · active 833 weeks ago
Tracy Belsher's avatar

Tracy Belsher · 833 weeks ago

Hmm...interesting discussion - I felt for Rusty, too. I'm one of those "sensitive" people who go movies and freak out when horses die in epic battle scenes - the humans? Meh. Am I desensitized? Probably. But I feel this way because the animals are helpless, led into danger by people and their hatred for each other. So...most humans can choose their path. Animals? Not so much.

Fantastic interview, thanks!
See why it made me think so much?

Again--I'm not judging. I'm simply answering the question what surprised me--and this did.

I collect money for the Humane Society at my signings--but I also raise money once a year for girls who are victims of violence and who most certainly cannot choose their path. (See my blog for a link to the VDay site for more info.)
Here's a statistic for you that added to my thinking about this: "Domestic violence is the major cause of death and disability for European women aged 16 to 44 and accounts for more death and ill-health than cancer or traffic accidents."

Crazy isn't it?

But yeah--I totally agree. Dogs are dependent upon humans and are helpless--which is what I talked about in the blog I wrote a few weeks ago about this.

Great discussion!
Wow, that is an amazingly sad statistic.

I do think movies, tv and even the news make us forget that violence against people is just as bad as animals. When an animal is mistreated, it's the #1 news story, but murder is not. There are 1,000s of murders every day (probably just in one large city alone) yet it's an afterthought. We only hear about the stories the media thinks will get rating. What does THAT say about our society?

I am just as guilty as everyone else. I cringed at the parts with Rusty. Not to say I didn't cringe at the cave scene. I guess the difference is my thoughts when I read the Rusty scenes or even some of the dog facts, I said to myself "WOW, I can't believe she decided to add violence against a dog," but never had one about any scene against a human. I've heard of people writing hate mail and never reading another word an author has written due to violence against an animal. I commend you for taking that leap and writing your story.
For the record, I didn't "add" the violence. Fred did. And I have little control over these people who show up in my books. Fred just snuck up on me one day and started to treat women and dogs badly. I do see him as a rather large metaphor.

But since we're here--you are not "guilty" of anything! You're RIGHT to feel that way about Rusty!
I love that human beings are so empathetic toward animals. It proves that we are capable of being that way toward humans again one day. :)

So--I'm hearing a resounding YES AMY--we can totally see why this stuff made you think!

amiright?
Very good point. Characters have a mind of their own. One of my main characters in my current WIP has schizophrenia. In the beginning, I didn't start out writing about a character with schizophrenia, it just happened. It's who he is. I didn't really have any say to the matter. Now the story centers around him and his mental illness.

And yes, you are totally right. :)
Re: the comment about dog violence and human violence. Sometimes I feel that people have so much more power, that abuse against animals is what I need to stand up for.
Which isn't coming out right... For the most part, the people in the book who are involved in violence, are choosing to be. You aren't a pirate in the 1600's because you think you get daisies. But Rusty deserves better, he is an innocent in all that.

Now that you replied in that way, I would definitely say that the part that bothered me 2nd after Rusty is the psycho Frenchman and his treatment of Emer. I mean, she does almost die, and she starts out an innocent, just like Rusty.
But it is almost... her humanity that makes me feel worse for Rusty, because he doesn't have that.

These were excellent questions!!!
1 reply · active 833 weeks ago
Yep--this is the exact same sort of thought process that goes through my head. I *love* animals and the mistreatment of them makes me want to throw up. But I'm sure most survivors of abuse will agree that they also did not have any route of escape and did not choose to have that happen to them. More throwing up, right?

But--you make a great point. As humans, we can think and talk and deal with our hardships. Dogs cannot do this.

Again--see why it made me think? :)

Thanks so much for coming around!
Have not finished reading yet...but I just had to come read her answers. I love her responces. They are clever, witty and not in the least bit pretentious (which some authors can sound like..)

Thumbs up on the questions, guys.
2 replies · active 832 weeks ago
Totally agree, Sara.

I can't thank you enough, Amy, for taking the time out to not only answer our questions, but also continue the discussion in the comments.
No worries. I loved being here today. You guys totally rock. And seriously--until I stop leaving the house with two-day-old dried refried beans stuck on my shirt, I can't officially join the pretentious club. I'm not sure that will ever happen.
Somehow I spaced and forgot to come back to see the answers. lol And such great answers they were. Thanks so much for answering my question, obviously I didn't finish the book til after the questions were closed, otherwise I would have had sooo many more. I'd say that makes sense to set a book in a time you're familiar with. While you're here in 2009 and therefore familiar with the time, you aren't a teen in 2009, so you likely won't have the same perspective. :) Though I imagine you could probably pull it off, since many other authors are just fine with it.

(I just got stopped by the comment police, more to come)
Honestly I think the scene in the cave with the Frenchmen bothered me more than the harsh treatment of Rusty. Don't get me wrong, I'm a vegetarian and volunteer w/ my local Humane Society, so I am definitely an animal lover. And I HATED to see Fred treat his dog that way, but Fred was such a sleaze and so obviously disturbed that I wasn't much surprised by his behavior. The scene in the cave really bothered me. I couldn't understand why she just gave up. I was so sad for her. Those types of scenes always bother me and they stay with me for a long, long time. I've been known to avoid books completely if I know there is any kind of sexual assault in it.

On an unrelated, happier note, Amy, now that I know you lived in Ireland I can completely see why you *heart* Tommy Tiernan. :) He needs to release another DVD. I've watched Something Mental about 500 times already.
Heather, I'm checking into this comment trail every few days, so DO ask those questions, if you have them! I'm totally up for answering! Thanks so much for your interest.

As for the cave scene--you might be surprised to hear I felt the same way about sexual assault scenes when I was writing the book. I don't like reading about it or [especially] seeing it on TV or in movies. More than that, I certainly do not like the fact that it happens to 1 in 4 girls and women, or that it happens every six minutes here in the US. Or that teenage girls are four times more likely to be victims. I hate all of those facts. I especially hate the fact that white slavery, as Emer experienced it in the 1600s, STILL HAPPENS, and girls (and boys) are sold every day here on Earth for the sole purpose of being sexual slaves. All of these things are ugly to me and I certainly don't want to write about them.

But, as I mentioned earlier about Fred being mean to Rusty, this scene just unfolded--completely against my own will, as I was writing. I hated it, but every time I tried to remove it, something told me that this scene was important, and removing it would be the wrong move. My many editors over the years agreed. Like every survivor, what happened to Emer was a huge part of her character from that moment on. As for the scene itself, I don't think Emer just gave up. I think, like all victims, this was done to her against her will and she could not fight. This is a reality for too many people, so I am glad we are here talking about it, even though, frankly, like you, it makes me uncomfortable. Breast Cancer and Erectile Dysfunction used to be things that made people uncomfortable, too, but now they are totally normal and are being confronted and battled and talked about on prime time TV. I only wish we could do the same for sexual assault--because if one out of four people had the bird flu, the whole country would be freaking out screaming EPIDEMIC!

Now--back to setting. Yes--my next books are partly set in this time period. I'm sure I can pull it off, too, but I have not set any in 2019, because I have no idea what teen life will be like then. :)

And Tommy Tiernan! Man, is he funny. There are so many hilarious Irish comics!

Thanks so much for reading & talking here, Heather.
2 replies · active 832 weeks ago
I guess it felt like she'd given up because she'd fought so hard and in fact killed to protect her chastity, and suddenly she wasn't fighting anymore. Though given the Frenchman's need to possess Emer I don't suppose any amount of fighting would have saved her. And you're right, sexual assault needs to be discussed despite discomfort. I've known let's see...5 girls who've been assaulted in my lifetime. And that's just off the top of my head. Sad, very sad.
More Irish comics? Do tell. I love me that accent. lol

Post a new comment

Comments by